The event was actually great opportunity to check there was a good fit in the Core set is consistent with the current WoW cataclysm Gold class identities are currently. It is true that there were some changes to the character identities as time has gone by and the regular changes from Hall of Fame and things similar to that. For example, Priest used to be adept at drawing lots of cards, but we've decreased that somewhat in recent times. Shaman was once capable of drawing a large number of cards. The Shaman team has reduced the number of cards too. This was an excellent chance to once again, affirm this is the distinct characteristics of our students. They have strengths and they are also their weaknesses and to ensure that they are reflected in the fundamental set of.

It's not just a matter of what's been removed and what's been added? If you're Rogue, you could notice an Burgle piece since that's what they've been doing in the last few years, or be seeing a little more self-sacrificing Warlock. These archetypes that these classes that players have been gravitating towards them over the last few years. And we're about to see a bit of that in their primary identity too.

So, you won't have to reinstate an Burgle mechanic each year to ensure it remains element of your identity.

Yeah. We've received many questions throughout the years, especially about functional reprints. Other card games also do that occasionally. It's not something we've attempted yet. However, with the Core set it's possible to look into Mechs for a whole year We have plenty of Mech cases from the past. Perhaps we'll revisit the Mechwarper. What do you think? If we do decide to make dragons in the future, perhaps we have some of those classic pieces we could bring to the core set for the year. This will open to us more design options for us to explore in the expansions.

What kind of variation can be expected in these yearly Core rotations?

I'm not sure we've hit the right number yet. We'd like to observe how cheap WoW Cataclysm Classic Gold players respond towards the Core set, and then see what they think of it, and what their use rate is, and such things. As we move forward, we're probably considering ballparks, between 30 to 35 percent. I believe that from year an year that it could vary but I'd think that a good baseline of it to remain the same every year.